Glen Beck

topic posted Fri, October 30, 2009 - 6:28 PM by  ALLAH God of...
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
He draws entirely from the factual record.
He plays videos and recordings of people saying and doing the most obscene things, He cites from articles written by these people
Then he draws some pretty easy obvious conclusions.

And the idiots keep calling him a liar.

What's he lied about?

Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Glen Beck

    Fri, October 30, 2009 - 8:11 PM
    lied means song in german, don't you know. i saw his book the other day and picked it up and browsed through it. i ain't going to buy it but if someone gave me a copy i'd read it. . .he's got someone working for him who has some sense, but not his photo editor. .
    • Re: Glen Beck

      Sat, October 31, 2009 - 9:45 AM
      It's his focus.
      People hate his angry, conservative, judgemental, holier than though self righteous pomposity. His crazy tantrums don't help either.
      Amy Goodwin on Pacifica is relentlessly attacking the pro-money pro-corporation pro-business camp, she is unapologetically socialist, feminist, and politically correct to a totalitarian liberal extreme. Yet she never lies, because she has a safetynet of 12-20 fact-checkers who keep her fat out of the fire. When people do accuse her of lies, she has another safeteynet of layers come and argue relativistic garbage until the accuser realizes they have less money than intention, and the libel just goes away, just like with Rush, Oreilly and Beck.
      Get Amy or Glen Beck away from their handlers, and I think you could coax enough lies out of them to fill a phone book. Extremists without their handlers are pretty morally vacant.
      • Re: Glen Beck

        Sat, October 31, 2009 - 9:52 AM
        I love Amy Goodman. Democracy, NOW! is a vital organ of information for the progressive minded. She rocks.

        www.opednews.com/articles/...1-217.html
        • Re: Glen Beck

          Sat, October 31, 2009 - 10:54 AM
          I only like her because I am a progressive, liberal, anti-corporate-hegemony social democrat who admires her for putting her own ass on the protest line. I also like how in a 3 hour show, she maybe editorializes for 30 minutes.
          I don't listen to Rush, but I understand a 3 hour show gets you a 3 hour editorial. That whole style of shouting at the mike for 3 hours/ emotional rollercoaster (doncha love watching Glen Beck cry?) that Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage/Oreilly/Beck was plagiarized from Alan Berg 25 years ago. The only difference is none of them have been shot in the head for gaining a conscious and turning on their corporate masters, YET!
          • Re: Glen Beck

            Sat, October 31, 2009 - 11:20 AM
            *************I don't listen to Rush,**************

            I liked Rush when Clinton was in office and Rush was telling his audience that he was "just entertainment."

            Then he started to take himself so very seriously and the pompous factor ruined it for me.

            On occasion I hear him being interviewed (I don't listen to talk radio ever) and I really like what he's got to say.

            Mind you: I'm one of those people who harbor a deep mistrust of government. I've read histories, studied European and ancient history formally in college as a major critical component of my education and I've come away with a sure knowledge that government is a horrible thing when it gets too much power. At no time in history has any government resisted the temptation of s continual acquisition of power. I view government as a dreadful and necessary evil.

            I understand that the Constitution is built to limit and restrain government by people who well understood what all governments throughout all history have done and saw it as a terrible evil that needed to be restricted and limited.

            Government by definition is the centralization of power. Concentrated Power by definition creates an imbalance. The people end up being ruled. The USA was built so that the government serves and never rules. The Founders created a Constitution that elevated the individual and vest the person with rights that stand as a check against government excess.

            We are tossing all that onto the trash heap of history and are creating for ourselves an imperial government with absolute power over every microscopic aspect of life.


            Look at how granular the Fed has been in the past telling people that they are FORBIDDEN to grow food in home gardens.
            supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/h..._ZS.html
            en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn
            www.oyez.org/cases/1940-...942/1942_59/
            Read it. A farmer wanted to grow wheat to feed his pigs which he slaughtered for his own family's consumption and the Fed stepped in and ordered him to desist. This was done under the Commerce Clause.

            www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/s...ndex.html
            Study this with especial attention to the commerce clause.

            That's what government can do with anything at all that is traded in interstate commerce - OR - might possibly in your wildest dreams have some impact on interstate commerce - as did farmer Filburn's itty bitty wheat crop.


            Then ask yourselves how much more power the Fed will have when it has a vested interest in your personal health and hygiene all the way down to your mental state.
            What invasions will be possible when the Fed can simply reach out and control every single thing about your life to the food you eat the music you listent to the exercise you get and can force you to surrender all your pribvacy to give government the power to regulate and manage everyting about you.
            tribes.tribe.net/america/t...890eeb36bb

            Think about unintended consequences.







            • Re: Glen Beck

              Sun, November 1, 2009 - 1:35 AM
              <<<I liked Rush when Clinton was in office and Rush was telling his audience that he was "just entertainment." >>>

              I listened to Rush daily for about 5 years in the early 90's, when I had only an AM radio in my van. While not agreeing with many of his opinions I thought his show was funny. When he responded to Jerry Garcia's death as 'just another dead doper' I realized how unnecessarily mean he was and quit listening.

              I do find it funny that some Republicans bow and scrape to him however.
              • Re: Glen Beck

                Sun, November 1, 2009 - 8:30 AM
                ************I do find it funny that some Republicans bow and scrape to him however. *************

                I have never observed any such thing.
                I think that is pure urban myth promulgated by the far left in their goal of having a Vodo doll into which to stick pins.
                • Re: Glen Beck

                  Sun, November 1, 2009 - 1:14 PM
                  <<<I have never observed any such thing. >>>

                  Hibernating back when the Rep congressman had to back pedal and apologize after the outcry for his criticism of Uncle Rush?
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Glen Beck

                    Mon, November 2, 2009 - 1:41 PM
                    ***********Hibernating back when the Rep congressman had to back pedal and apologize after the outcry for his criticism of Uncle Rush?*********

                    If I recall you are talking not about a Repub Representative but Michael Steele and I rather suspect that you might have even forgotten what Steele said. At any rate "bowing and scraping" is a tad on the histrionic side don't you think?
        • Re: Glen Beck

          Sat, October 31, 2009 - 11:01 AM
          i can't get past his sententious, histrionic presentation enough
          to be able to listen to what he says for longer than a few minutes

          his style make it impossible for anyone looking for astute,
          pragmatic commentary to take him seriously.
          • Re: Glen Beck

            Sat, October 31, 2009 - 11:09 AM
            *********i can't get past his sententious, histrionic presentation enough
            to be able to listen to what he says for longer than a few minutes**********

            When he first came i on the air I laughed at him and dismissed him as a lightweight clown, as a know nothing moron who would have a hard time signing his own name without a cue card.

            He has since found a serious voice and has something important to say.

            Now the man is saying exactly what is going on in my mind. He is looking at too much power being sought by too few people and for reasons that appear too alien to everything that is American.

            When I hear him now, I cheer.
      • Re: Glen Beck

        Sat, October 31, 2009 - 11:06 AM
        *******************It's his focus.*******************


        And that says it all.
        He disagrees with the far left. And for that they despise him and work to discredit and destroy.

        ***********People hate his angry, conservative, judgemental, holier than though self righteous pomposity.***********

        I don't see any of those things in his manner or style. I don't see him as judgmental or holier than any one at all.
        I'd very much like to see what you mean so if you have links to some U-Tube , or whatnot, that illustrates what you mean by angry. holier than. and judgmental I'd like to see it.


        ********** His crazy tantrums don't help either.************

        He has backed away from the crazy crap in the last month or three. He seems to understand that he is quite possibly ther only person on the Telly who is seriously trying to uncover the truth this administration is hiding from the people.

        *********Amy Goodwin on Pacifica**************

        Never heard of her. Cute name tho.

        ***************Get Amy or Glen Beck away from their handlers, and I think you could coax enough lies out of them to fill a phone book. Extremists without their handlers are pretty morally vacant.*****************

        I wonder about that. It seems rather judgmental to say that about people who you just claimed have researchers they use to keep their facts straight. Your statement informs that these are people who very much want to be coming from a basis in truth and factual accuracy. Why would they resort to lying just because their researchers went on holiday?

  • Re: Glen Beck

    Sat, October 31, 2009 - 2:21 PM
    [And the idiots keep calling him a liar.

    What's he lied about?]

    I don't call him a liar. I call him a moron.
    The asshole couldn't even spell "oligarchy" on a program that he had clearly rehearsed.
    He is a cluck. End of report.
    • Re: Glen Beck

      Sat, October 31, 2009 - 5:38 PM
      Beck is nothing more than an opportunist. At best, he's an entertainer. He manipulates his viewer's emotions in order to sell a program that will attract advertisers. That is his function.
      • Re: Glen Beck

        Sun, November 1, 2009 - 1:38 AM
        <<<Beck is nothing more than an opportunist.... He manipulates his viewer's emotions in order to sell a program that will attract advertisers.>>>

        I always likened Beck to a religious shyster in that regard. I'm sure he's making a good living at it, good for him.
        • Re: Glen Beck

          Sun, November 1, 2009 - 2:48 AM
          Hey! I like Jerry Garcia! Take that back you meanie, you taint his memory~

          (If you remember the Dead show... you weren't there!)
    • Re: Glen Beck

      Sun, November 1, 2009 - 8:31 AM
      God forbid anyone misspell a word.
      I mean that standing alone is all the reason any one would ever need to dismiss a human completely.
  • Re: Glen Beck

    Sun, November 1, 2009 - 8:34 AM
    So I asked what he's said that is lie and the only reply I have gotten so far is :

    I hate him.

    That's it. Every single response about Beck has been purely visceral opinion. And I rather suspect it is one that is purely the outgrowth of closed mindedness and political bias manifesting as hatred of another human for no reason more noble than the fact of a disagreement over politics.

    I believe that's all I've seen here.


    • Re: Glen Beck

      Sun, November 1, 2009 - 10:12 AM
      not from me

      i made no judgment about his content
      - only his style

      i haven't watched him enough to make a call
      on what he says

      (and due to his presentation, i probably never will)

      that said
      i have noticed that a lot of the most vocal anti - Fox people
      have spent very little (if any) time actually watching it.
    • Re: Glen Beck

      Sun, November 1, 2009 - 1:03 PM
      [That's it. Every single response about Beck has been purely visceral opinion. And I rather suspect it is one that is purely the outgrowth of closed mindedness and political bias manifesting as hatred of another human for no reason more noble than the fact of a disagreement over politics.

      I believe that's all I've seen here. ]

      Perhaps the same sort of closed mindedness about politics that leads some psychologically imbalanced Tribesters to incessantly claim that the Democrats are despots plotting to subjugate the American people under the yoke of communism, despite the fact that anybody with even a lick of sense knows that is palpably untrue.
      • Re: Glen Beck

        Mon, November 2, 2009 - 1:43 PM
        *************Perhaps the same sort of closed mindedness about politics that leads some psychologically imbalanced Tribesters to incessantly claim that the Democrats are despots plotting to subjugate the American people under the yoke of communism, despite the fact that anybody with even a lick of sense knows that is palpably untrue.****************

        I think you are so inured to the blight of communism that you are incapable of sensing it.

        Even Pravda is laughing at the USA for the left's mad headlong rush in to communism
        • Re: Glen Beck

          Mon, November 2, 2009 - 9:18 PM
          [I think you are so inured to the blight of communism that you are incapable of sensing it.]

          I think you are so mentally ill that you are utterly beyond any sort of help.

          Either that or you are the crudest jokester who ever lived, a buffoon so intent on posting ridiculous nonsense that you have no interest in whether or not anybody pays any attention to what you say.
          • Re: Glen Beck

            Tue, November 3, 2009 - 6:27 AM
            ****************I think you are so mentally ill that you are utterly beyond any sort of help.
            Either that or you are the crudest jokester who ever lived, a buffoon so intent on posting ridiculous nonsense that you have no interest in whether or not anybody pays any attention to what you say.*******************

            See what I mean?

            The mere mention of the name Glen Beck has sent you into a frenzy of pointless name calling and unfocused rage.
            You are not capable of forming a cogent thought or reply so instead you simply lash out with all that ugliness.
            • Re: Glen Beck

              Tue, November 3, 2009 - 11:19 AM
              Cogent thoughts. . .get your cogent thoughts, right here. . .finest quality, best prices. . .Cogent thoughts. . .

              Available for Bears, for Bills for Beezlebub and Bimbos. . .

              Get your cogent thoughts here. . .limited time only. .
              • Re: Glen Beck

                Tue, November 3, 2009 - 12:17 PM
                The world should be beating a path to your door.

                Sadly when it comes to these religions and sacred cows people toss the notion of ratiocinatic thought out the door.

                When Politics is religion the riders can never see the precipice.
                • Re: Glen Beck

                  Tue, November 3, 2009 - 6:56 PM
                  Let me repeat myself, the bear has crap stuck in his ears it appears...

                  People on the right scream LIAR at Amy Goodwin every hour of every day, they sue her for libel and slander. It NEVER sticks... EVER! She has never been proven to be a liar because she has an office full of people making sure she walks that razor's edge of relativism so she can make scandalous claims and not pay.

                  I don't listen to Glen Beck, he is grating and hystrionic so I choose not to listen. I am betting he makes outrageous claims too, and his army of lawyers keeps his ass out of the fire.

                  If having lawyers keep you on the edge of some relativistic, barely-legal definition of the truth, then how the heck do you keep any personal relationships in life?
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Glen Beck

                    Tue, November 3, 2009 - 7:31 PM
                    ***************Let me repeat myself, the bear has crap stuck in his ears it appears..**************

                    Not for nothing but, no one was calling you names.



                    **********People on the right scream LIAR at Amy Goodwin every hour of every day, they sue her for libel and slander.*************

                    Wow. It must be like all two of 'em. I never heard of Amy Goodman.
                    Your post was the very first time I ever heard her name.
                    So either I'm living on another planet or you have got something wrong.


                    ***********I don't listen to Glen Beck, he is grating and hystrionic so I choose not to listen.***********

                    I never did either until very recently.
                    Lately he's not giving any one any wiggle room. This week he's been hammering the Repubs.
                    Hos treatment of the Administration is however what has attracted my attention.
                    It's like Beck is the only person in the USA who is trying to tell the truth about the administration's communist Mayo Tse Tung worshiping pals. Beck is the only person talking about the Administrations advisers and the papers they've authored and things they've said.

                    And UNLIKE Steve Doocy and the other 2 morons on the FOX & Friends morning show when I fact check Beck, he ends up being 100% spot on. As a general rule whenever the "Friends" morning crew make an announcement of some politically charged thing It turns out to be either just plain wrong or a wild inflation of the facts. Fox & Friends is entirely unreliable. Beck is making his bones as a hard core digger of facts and truth.


                    ************* I am betting he makes outrageous claims too, and his army of lawyers keeps his ass out of the fire.**********

                    I haven't heard them.
                    But merely betting is a lousy reason to dismiss someone.

                    **********If having lawyers keep you on the edge of some relativistic, barely-legal definition of the truth, then how the heck do you keep any personal relationships in life?************

                    Well, I'm an attorney and I can tell you that lawyers are not where I'd go to make sure that my political facts and information were correct. Lawyers are all fine and well but, for fact digging and checking a good team of researchers would be infinitely less costly and probably much better.
                    Where did all this about lawyers come from anyway?
                    You are tossing this "lawyers" thing around like it's something you troubled to fact check.
                    Did you?
                    You didn't just make it up as you typed did you?
                    Or did you?